The reported legal action instituted by the University of South Africa (UNISA) against content creator Lerato Lenyehelo, popularly known as Doctor Che, has sparked widespread debate on social media, with users expressing differing views on freedom of expression, comedy and institutional reputation.
UNISA is reportedly seeking a court interdict against Lenyehelo over his online comedy series titled “Lawyers from UNISA Be Like”, which has attracted attention across social media platforms.
According to a court document dated 11 November 2026, the matter was brought before the Gauteng Division of the High Court in Pretoria.
UNISA allegedly argues that the videos created by Lenyehelo are defamatory and could damage the institution’s reputation and that of its law graduates.
While some of his followers consider the videos harmless entertainment, others have supported UNISA’s reported legal action, arguing that the content could reinforce negative perceptions of the institution and the quality of its law qualifications.
Taking to X, user @LefatsheMoagi expressed support for UNISA’s position, arguing that universities have a responsibility to protect their reputations and the credibility of their qualifications.
“Universities pride themselves in ensuring that their qualifications are on par with international institutions to keep a certain rank. The guy is talented but for institutions like UNISA working extremely hard to attract students based on their ranking, he must concede with his content,” the user commented.
Another user, @Sihle_ZA, also questioned the impact of the comedy series, suggesting that it could influence public perceptions of UNISA graduates.
“No way he is winning this. This type of comedy is very harmful. People may start questioning the legitimacy of the degrees offered by UNISA, their professionals and competency. A line has to be drawn no matter how harmless joke appears to be,” the user wrote.
Meanwhile, @Talldime, who identified themselves as a UNISA law graduate, shared a personal perspective, saying the content reinforced existing stereotypes about graduates from the institution.
“I am a lawyer from UNISA and I didn’t find this funny at all. It adds to the stereotype and misconceptions that are out there about us,” the user added.
The matter has reignited conversations about the boundaries of comedy and creative expression, particularly when humour involves established institutions and professional qualifications.
It also raises questions about the balance between an individual’s right to creative expression and an institution’s interest in protecting its reputation.
