The National Consumer Commission (NCC) in South Africa has launched a priority investigation into nine major suppliers of sanitary pads and panty liners following alarming findings from a University of the Free State (UFS) study. Released in February 2026, the research analysed 16 popular sanitary pad brands and 8 panty liner varieties available in local stores, revealing the presence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in every tested product—even those labeled as “organic” or “chemical-free.”
These EDCs, including phthalates, bisphenols like BPA, and parabens, were detected in low concentrations but raise significant concerns due to repeated exposure through skin and mucosal contact. Experts link such chemicals to potential health issues, including hormonal imbalances, infertility, endometriosis, and increased cancer risks, affecting millions of women and girls who rely on these products monthly.
NCC Acting Commissioner Hardin Ratshisusu emphasised the urgency, stating, “The findings from the UFS study highlight serious concerns for women’s and girls’ health, prompting us to assess compliance with the Consumer Protection Act’s quality and safety standards.” The investigation targets suppliers and their brands, giving them an opportunity to respond before any final decisions, such as potential recalls under Section 60 of the act.
Here’s a breakdown of the suppliers and brands involved, based on the products examined in the study:
| Supplier | Brand(s) |
|---|---|
| Kimberly-Clark of SA (Pty) Ltd | Kotex |
| Procter & Gamble (Pty) Ltd | Always |
| Anna Organics | Anna Organics |
| The Lion Match Company (Pty) Ltd | Comfitex |
| Premier FMCG (Pty) Ltd | Lil-Lets |
| Essity South Africa (Pty) Ltd | Libresse |
| Johnson & Johnson (Pty) Ltd | Stayfree |
| Willflow | Willflow |
| Other unspecified | Additional brands under review |
Suppliers must now provide independent lab tests for EDCs or conduct new analyses. While no recalls have been issued yet, the NCC is expanding its scope to include tampons. Public reactions on social media platforms like X have sparked calls for greater awareness, with users advocating for alternatives such as menstrual cups or reusable cloth pads.
The UFS researchers recommend choosing products certified by standards like OEKO-TEX Standard 100, which ensures low chemical residues. They also urge stronger regulations in South Africa to address monitoring gaps that allow these contaminants. This case mirrors similar global concerns, such as a 2022 study in India uncovering toxins in feminine hygiene products.
For consumers worried about exposure, health experts suggest consulting professionals and exploring verified low-chemical options. As the investigation unfolds, it underscores the need for transparency and stricter oversight in the feminine hygiene industry to protect public health.